On World Day Against the Death Penalty, opponents of capital punishment demanded its worldwide abolition. Today, in 2019, even democracies such as the United States of America or Japan still stick to this medieval, inhumane practice.
In its short history, the state of Israel has executed one single person. Adolf Eichmann, known as the ‘architect of the Holocaust’, who organized Nazi Germany’s genocide of millions of Jews and tens of thousands of members of other minorities, was abducted from his hiding place in Argentina.
Do Certain Crimes Justify Capital Punishment?
The Mossad managed to transport him to Jerusalem, where he was tried, convicted and put to death. Just like in the cases of other Nazi war criminals who were executed after the Nuremberg trials, no human rights activists complained. The scope of their terrible crimes which led to countless deaths was unimaginable. After World War II, applying the death penalty was justified in those cases, to the opinion of most people on the planet.
At the same time these post-war cases show one of the problems the death penalty has: What kind of crimes justify it today, if any? Who says so? Can abuse be ruled out? Will a future government try to extend the list of crimes which warrant the death penalty?
Killing terrorists who have murdered civilians or who are planning to do so, by shooting them or sending them a ‘greeting’ in the form of a cruise missile, is different. Terrorists and dictators who support or spread terror usually do not negotiate. Waging war against them is usually the only way to stop them and to save lives. This is not about the death penalty, but about war, a different subject.
Is Punishing by Death a Contradiction?
The death penalty is being applied when any state kills someone as a punishment for a crime. But isn’t this description a contradiction? A punishment is supposed to show the convict he or she has to refrain from doing it again and take responsibility. But once they are dead, they do not even know what happened to them.
Death penalty opponents have arguments which are hard to just brush aside as nonsense. For instance there is the danger of deadly mistakes, in the sense that someone who was executed can not be revived once it turns out he or she was not even guilty. Especially in the United States, another argument would have the potential to end the death penalty, under normal circumstances: discrimination.
For poor criminals who cannot afford capable attorneys, including members of large minorities such as African Americans and Latinos, the probability of being sentenced to death is a lot higher than for criminals with a different background. Capital punishment opponents believe that this fact alone should be reason enough to kill the death penalty. (Note: Article continues below ‘Related Post’ teasers.)
Iran, China and Others
The number of opponents is growing, but many countries keep on executing people. One of the most terrible examples is Iran. Here, reasons for executions include, murder, drug trafficking, armed robbery; kidnapping, but also homosexuality, incestuous relations, fornication, prohibited sexual relations, prostitution, blasphemy, using pornographic materials to solicit sex, and one crime which speaks for itself: recidivist false accusation of capital sexual offenses causing execution of an innocent person.
In Africa, many countries still have capital punishment. The same applies to Asia. China seems to be executing more people than the rest of the world combined. Also more Middle Eastern countries such as Saudi Arabia use the death penalty. So do Japan, Taiwan, Singapore and Malaysia. India executes criminals in extreme cases. In Russia, a moratorium on the death penalty is in place.
On the American continent, things look different. Some Caribbean states officially have capital punishment, but hardly ever apply it. In South America, Brazil, Chile, El Salvador, Guatemala, and Peru use it for extremely harsh crimes only. In this regard, the United States have more in common with Middle Eastern for Far Eastern countries than with its European or American partners.
Europe Fights Death Penalty
In the United States of America, 25 people were executed so far in 2019, less than in most years since capital punishment was reinstated. In 30 out of 50 states, it still exists. In those, homicide-related crimes can be punished by death. The same applies to drug trafficking, espionage, terrorism. America seems to be split regarding the question whether capital punishment should be abolished.
The European Union is using its influence to fight the death penalty in other parts of the world. While the former GDR did execute people until 1987, the Federal Republic of Germany is one of the staunchest opponents of the practice. The country says it rejects capital punishment for ethic, moral and legal reasons. Germany’s goal is the worldwide abolishment of the death penalty.
Berlin and the entire European Union will not extradite any criminal or suspect to any country if he or she might be facing the death penalty. The subject is often part of the agenda during state visits of European heads of government to China or Middle Eastern countries. They do not seem to be talking about it with partners like Washington or Tokyo, which is a rather weird aspect.
Bärbel Kofler: ‘Inhumane and Useless’
Today, on World Day Against the Death Penalty, the German government’s Commissioner for Human Rights Policies and Humanitarian Help, Bärbel Kofler, said the death penalty needed to be abolished since it controverted human dignity and the right to life.
“It is inhumane and useless. Studies show that the death penalty does not keep potential culprits from committing crimes”, Kofler stated. She also mentioned the danger of executions of innocent individuals. “With our European partners and many other states, we demand a worldwide abolition of the death penalty.” She also said existing death sentences should be suspended.